From: Newbie Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage Subject: For all bondage newbies Pt 3 Date: 20 Dec 1995 18:50:11 GMT Hi again! This is the third question/answer letter between Master M1 and myself. As usual, no editing has taken place. Many thanks to Master M1 for his time, patience, and permission to post this and all other letters. Newbie ========================================================= NB>>and female doms. They tend to have slaves that are younger...perhaps >>age brings wisdom? Or something else, Or I could be dead wrong. NB>...or it could be that in society, the assumption is that the elder has a >natural authority of the younger? This would translate smoothly into an >older dom with a younger sub. Might be, but I tend to think not...I won't even enter into this since in the Mistress community (correct me if I am wrong) there are many young mistress's with older guys groveling at their feet. NB>>wrong. She denied that anything was wrong. Finally she told me that a >>loud commanding voice scared her, that the softer I spoke the faster >>she wanted to do something. I also learned through this communication NB>As with this new budding relationship [btw congrats and best wishes], the >communication plays a vital role. When you do start new master/slave >relationships, there must be some ways to "test the waters" and find out >just what will work and what won't. I guess this is where my "safe words" >question came from - the way in which a master and slave will discover what >is pleasurable and what is not [ie strong commanding voice vs low soft >voice]. Being experienced, you obvioiusly are more in tune with the signs >of when a new slave is enjoying the budding relationship and can learn from >her reactions. Each one works out their own ways of "testing the waters" Just last week I heard from a potential "slave" with whom I had extensive correspondence some time ago. She and I never made it. Why? Communication. She was new, I experienced. She called herself a "slave" and I objected to that term, she was offended by my telling her that she was NOT a "slave" that she could not call herself that, while there were other "Masters" telling her that she was a good one. At that time she seemed to me to be topping from the bottom and she would deny it, but her actions spoke louder than words. I now realize that if one says and perceives ones self to be a "slave" then they ARE just that. However, they may not be a "slave" for or too me....I have already apologized to her for my lack of understanding. Experience seems to have little to do with it. I can be a clod, unfeeling, etc., witness my statements above...what I think it is is that certain something, that defies definition, the fact that you smell roses, your walk is lighter, your senses ever more acute, It is called I believe chemistry. So I for one say YES, "better living through chemistry." Thanks for the congrats btw, I am very happy even though we have yet to meet. For the man who does not like email....oh well life is full of constantly changing things. I guess thats what makes it so much fun. NB>However, when you obtained your first slave, was this >"emotional link" easy to establish, or was there a period when the two of >you were learning through trial and error? Well no. <laughs> in fact my first experience (not first slave) was a hoot. How about handcuffing the biggest busted girl in junior high to the fence at lunch time, feel her up, having her wiggle and say, "stop it, no don't do that" but never screaming....that is until the two of us realized that he didn't have the keys...Then she screamed... After that for some reason it went very easily. My shrink says this is because I was raised by multiple mother figures and in high school had the unusual experience of sort of being "adopted" by the three most popular girls who called me their "brother" and while our relationship was NEVER sexual they acted as if it were when we were in public and that bolstered me, made guys jealous, but there was never anything happening, but they knew of my desires, and although they thought of me as very kinky they sort of taught me and filled in the points about women that i did not understand or learn from the multiple mothers. NB>The new woman in my life and I have discussed somewhat the possibility of us >beginning a sub/dom relationship, although I'm not sure how close to a >master/slave it would be. Right now, we talk more about me giving >instructions and thinking of suitable punishments if she doesn't carry them >out. What confuses me is that, although the idea of instructing someone >arouses me, I have also maintained that I derive pleasure from satisfying >the woman. BTW, congratulations to you too. Interesting that when we first started corresponding a few short weeks ago you despaired of ever finding anyone, remember? IMHO, you are doing very well. Don't be confused, I think that what you feel is perfectly normal. If you have a relationship if the woman is NOT satisfied why would she remain your slave, or want anything to do with you? Remember however that pleasure and satisfaction come from many different areas. This is one of the reasons that I can have many slaves. One of them for example can cum just from my whispering in her ear. Sometimes (depending on her mood) I will whisper, "You cunt slut, fucking whore, your slit is getting wet just listening to me, CUM for me WHORE!" and she does. Sometimes I sense that she needs something different and it might be, "I love you, I need you, and I want to make you happy, touch my cock while I whisper of my love for you, and cum when you do..." and she can...We also get into some heavy sado-masochistic play, but at a different time. I have another slave who is a pain slut. If I don't really hurt her she can't have an orgasm. I love this, but what she likes is that I don't do it HER way. I use imagination and vary her ordeals of pleasure. Then there is...oh you get the idea I am sure. NB>In every relationship I've had so far, I have made every effort >to satisfy the woman before I am given sexual pleasure. I enjoy the results >of my efforts when I can read the woman well enough to know exactly where >and how to touch her. Is it possible for a relationship to exist where the >roles reverse from time to time? Ah the secrets of being a good lover. however what you have described is not IMHO a role reversal...rather being a kind and considerate Master...someone a woman might WANT to serve...unless of course part of your discussions concerns her binding you, etc. When I was very young I used to tell women, "Look if I do anything that you REALLY don't like, or if I hurt you too much, then you can do the male equivalent to me." I only had a taker one time....and she laughed when I started to tell her she was doing it wrong. She admitted that she wanted to see if I was really serious and that, no, I hadn't truly hurt her too much...so we then decided that she should be punished for that...lots of fun. NB>Thanks again for your time... I haven't posted your last two replys to the >ASB as I'm unsure if I have your permission. You stated it was ok for your I know that but as I told you when we first started go ahead, just quote it all....I will post this one to ASB. M1
![]() |
Last updated: 03 Nov 1996 This site supports personal privacy and recommends PGP. Page design by Dimentech |